1 Comment

Thoughts and Notes on T4G

About ten days ago, four of the five residents from BACC went to a conference together: Together for the Gospel. We had a great time engaging in the talks but probably the most notable experience was the time we spent together, downloading what we’d learned and getting to know each other better.

T4G Overall

I’ve not done this before, but felt it was useful for myself in thinking through the conference. I decided to give the conference a score, based on nothing other than my own perspective and preferences. 

So, overall, I give 2018 T4G a 6.5/10. Here is the breakdown.

  • 7/10 for organization: tough to organize 12,000 people, very uncertain for first two days where and when the main sessions were, despite the app. App was neat but could have been better utilized.
  • 3/10 for diversity: no female voice, no Latino voice, no non-American speakers. Only reason a 3 instead of a 1 because there was diversity in age and they did have two black speakers. 
  • 10/10 for free stuff: came home with two dozen free books, equal to more than conference cost, much to my wife’s dismay.
  • 8/10 for messages: very very rich, exegetical preaching. Only once or twice did I disagree with the basis or doctrine behind a talk. Some unforgettable, trend setting talks as well (see below).
  • 5/10 for conference food: ended up not eating it despite paying for the food plan… wish I could get my money back. (also Louisville has great food options, so why I bought the food plan, I’m not sure).
  • 3 OR 9/10 for breakout sessions (so taking the average: 6/10): 3 because there were so few and difficult to get to or know content ahead of time (I really like breakouts/workshops - they are more engaging in my opinion). 9 because I went to all three David Platt’s breakouts (not on purpose) and they were very very well done. Lots of tangible, applicable information (see below).

The Notable Talks:

I would highly, highly recommend watching these talks, in the order I have them listed below. If something is being shared that makes you uncomfortable or you disagree with, I encourage you to persist and watch through to the end.

  1. HB Charles’ message about the cross. This was such a fantastic, grounding talk on the truth of the cross and its ramifications for life.
  2. David Platt’s message about racism. This is the one that you might disagree with. Or maybe it will make you jump up with affirmation. Either way, I encourage you to listen to it and ask God to show you what he wants you to take away from it. Comment below your thoughts!
  3. Ligon Duncan’s message about holiness. This is an excellent follow-up to Platt’s message. I highly recommend watching both of them. Ligon talks about our call to holiness, how we’ve been set apart and made whole. 

I did not sit in on all of the talks, so feel free to check out the other recordings on the T4G homepage. There was only one talk that I sat in on (ok, actually, I got up and left... don't be like me, though!) that I had a hard time listening to based on the speaker’s thoughts on church, but you’ll have to message me separately if you’re curious about that.

My Notes on Platt's Breakout Sessions:

If any of these notes don’t make sense, comment below or email me. Below is David Platt and I. After being at all three of his sessions, I think we were basically best friends. 

Cross Preconference

me and platt
  • Not all Christians are missionaries and we dilute the definition when we call them that.
  • All are called to make disciples. Missionary is different than Christian.
  • A missionary should be defined as a Christian, set apart by the Holy Spirit, sent by the church to cross cultural, linguistic, geographic barriers to make disciples of unreached people groups.
  • How to know you are called: read you Bible. Fast regularly.
  • Missionary training starts in the local church.
  • Missionary training should not end in the local church.
  • Short term missions develop a culture of missions well.
  • Instead of asking the congregation “If God is calling you to be an overseas missionary...” ask the question “If you feel like you want to talk to your pastors/elders to discern whether you are being called to be a missionary…”
  • “There is no such thing as transformation by aviation” - in other words, anyone who is planning/feeling called to be a missionary should be doing cross-cultural disciple making at home.

12 Critical Issues in Global Missions

  1. The authority of the Bible. There is increasing skepticism on the authority of Scripture worldwide. Only 64% of senior pastors think studying the Bible is essential. The authority of Scripture is SO foundational, critical, essential for missions (and salvation).
  2. The content of the Gospel. Must be clear on what it is and what all it has done; don’t dilute the gospel in an effort to lead more to Jesus. “The last thing the world needs is the exportation of nominal Christianity.”
  3. The necessity of evangelism. We will be tempted to be silent, but the greatest need of humankind is the Gospel. Romans 10:13-15 - the Gospel is never shared in Acts/NT without the tool/vehicle of a believer.
  4. The identity of the missionary. Not every Christian is a missionary. We must take the Gospel to where it has not yet gone. Globalization has increased the opportunities/ways people can be missionaries.
  5. The role of the local church. Training should start here, churches should send missionaries and missionaries should desire a sending church.
  6. The mobilization of the global church. Laborers for the harvest should come from the harvest: the nations on missions to the nations. In 2050, 40% of Christians will live in sub-Saharan Africa- this is a missions sending force!
  7. The migration of peoples. God orchestrates the movement of peoples. Never before in history did the world have more displaced peoples (refugees) than it does right now.
  8. The movement to cities. More than 50% of the world lives in cities now. Acts 19:10 - all Asia heard the Gospel because it was preached in a city.
  9. The prevalence of poverty. Be gospel-centered, gospel preaching to the nations, many of which are very poor and very sick. Churches need to be planted there.
  10. The spread of Islam. By 2050, the number of muslims will about equal the number of Christians in the world. Because Christians are delaying marriage, delaying childbearing, having less children.
  11. The reality of illiteracy. Make the Gospel and word of God known, but there are still 1 billion people in the world who cannot read. We must prioritize oral sharing and oral methods as well.
  12. The theology of suffering. We must train and teach missionaries how to suffer well. God specifically uses suffering for the spread of the Gospel. Acts 9:16 - Paul was appointed to suffer for Jesus’ namesake. 

10 Questions Pastors Should Ask Themselves

  1. Are you, in your church, preaching the Word in the context of the world?
  2. Are you calling people to radical identification with Christ?
  3. Are you equipping and expecting ordinary disciples to make disciples in extraordinary ways?
  4. Are you giving sacrificially for global missions?
  5. Are you fasting and praying fervently for missions?
  6. Are you continually communicating the general command [to make disciples] and periodically issuing a specific call [to be a missionary]?
  7. Are you nurturing an atmosphere of sending out your best?
  8. Are you celebrating continual (STMs) and creative (BAM, tent making) sending?
  9. Are you stewarding the sending relationships God gives you?
  10. Are you training your church to sacrifice willingly and suffer well?

Again, please use this forum as an avenue for discussion. I would love to engage with some of these things with you!

1 Comment

Comment

Week Three

Last week, we had to read Luke and Acts, paying close attention to evangelism and discipleship.

Although I have read Luke 10 and the surrounding context countless times, meditating on and even teaching on the “person of peace” method of evangelism, I have often overlooked the discipleship that is going on here. Reading Luke with the focused lense on discipleship showed me something I have often overlooked: Jesus models in the group setting, sends out in the group setting, debriefs in the group setting, and trains in the group setting. Everything he does is in a group! 

I was acutely aware of this after reading Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes (I highly recommend this book!) and learning about our individualistic and collectivistic differences with Scripture. In Luke 5, Jesus calls some of the disciples, not individually, but collectively. Then throughout chapters 6-9, he is either teaching in the presence of the disciples, performing miracles in the presence of the disciples, or specifically teaching the disciples. He models and explains/debriefs always in the context of the group, even when having a “personal” conversation.

Then, even before they are “ready” (the disciples are quite immature still and do not understand much of what Jesus has shown them), Jesus sends them out (ch 9) - also in that group context. When they return, they tell him everything (verse 10) and he “withdrew” with them, in what I must assume as an intentional time to debrief and teach them from what they experienced.

In this realization, I saw two things that I need to incorporate into my own discipleship methods: discipleship should happen in a group setting and people should be “sent out” to experience and practice ministry early, even before they are “ready”.
 

Comment

Comment

First Two Weeks

This is my first summary but I've finished the first two weeks of the ten week class. We read Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes in that time. In these two weeks, I've learned:

  • We interact with Scripture and read it through several lenses, probably the most significant is that of our culture.

  • Reading Scripture through my cultural lense limits me sometimes. The example the book shared was about how, in retelling the story of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15), Westerners often forget to include the detail about the famine. We have never experienced famine, so it does not stick out. When compared to the retelling by Russians, they almost always included that detail and saw the story actually as an example of God’s sovereignty to bring his children back to himself vs how we tend to see it: the loving, open arms of the forgiving Father (both are accurate but the difference of take-away based on culture is interesting).

  • Both Old and New Testaments were written by people from a collectivist society to people in a collectivist society. So, when I read it from the context of my individualistic society and apply it to my individualistic society, I can actually misinterpret or misapply or simply miss out on what the text meant. I realized I need to slow down my tendency to apply scripture personally and really read it deeply to ensure that was the intent of the author.

 

That's just a quick download of these two weeks. Let me know if you have questions! Click here and drop a comment or question for clarification (I'm testing out a blog!).

Comment

1 Comment

Spring 2018

During the Spring 2018 quarter, I, Trevin, will be sharing a quick paragraph summary each week of what I am learning. The topic will almost exclusively come from my "Evangelism and Discipleship in Cross-Cultural Contexts" course, but don't be surprised if I throw some other fun things in there. Please feel free to comment or ask questions if you're curious to know more!

My purpose in doing this is two-fold. First, I want to make available the great take-aways that I am being exposed to during this intense season of learning. Second, as an extrovert, I almost always am thinking about who I can share new ideas with- so now I have an immediate avenue for that!

I will not post more than 250 words to help both of us stay on top of all our other commitments.

1 Comment

Comment

Back in town; Background

We're back. We're invigorated. We're stretched. And we're excited to debrief with you.

My hope is that you were able to follow along with us during our adventure in Poland through the team blog. If not, then click that link to check it out and at least get a snippet. We had such a fun yet draining time. In the most recent post I pointed something out.


I mentioned and admitted that while telling you all about the who, what, when, and where, we forgot to tell you WHY. It will take me a couple posts, but I'd like to take some time to do that now, over here, on this blog. You can still read about more of our experiences in Poland at polandbacc.blogspot.com and hear about polish food, communicating across a language barrier, Catholic cathedrals, and how to stay involved with the Otrembas through our future posts.


To understand WHY we did what we did, we need to first paint the landscape of where.


The country of Poland we know today was only established in 1989. Before that there was Russian communist rule and before that there was a LOT of different borders, rulers, wars, and partitions. The people of Poland (generally of Slavic decent) have a history of living there for the last 1,500 years. One thousand five hundred years! That makes us here in the U.S. look so young...


Over the course of those 1500 years, Cieszyn, the town where Tomek and Damaris Otremba reside, was established. Around 810, actually. About a hundred years after that, Catholicism found a foothold throughout Poland. And since then, the only thing that has remained constant besides the people is the Catholic Church. So as the saying goes, "to be Polish is to be Catholic."


Well I'm Dutch. Never been there, but I bleed orange, so that makes me Dutch. Of course when someone asks where I'm from, I tell them I'm from the United States. If they inquire more (like "where is Hoekzema from?!"), then I tell them about the Netherlands. To be American is to simply live here. We all have many different origins.


Here's some hypothetical (yet historical) questions:

If you're Slavic, your ancestors have been there for over a thousand years, and the Poland you live in is no longer a country, then what are you?  Or if the Poland you live in is ruled by an oppressive force and you don't want to associate with them, then what are you? OR if you've been displaced from your Poland and your country no longer exists, then what are you?

You are what you've always been: Catholic (or Jewish...)


We went to Poland. A country where today 95% of the population belongs to the Roman Catholic Church. That means of the 38.5 million Pols, 36.5 million of them are Catholic. Poland used to have a large Jewish population but due to the Nazi movement, many of them were killed.


So why did we go to Poland?


Being Catholic in Poland is simply what you do. It does not necessarily mean that you believe in Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior. Tomek and Damaris wake up every morning hoping to have the opportunity to introduce people to Jesus as someone they can have a personal relationship with. 


We prayed for those people. We invited those people to parties. We went to Poland to simply help Tomek and Damaris in their mission to share Jesus. A mission that we strive for everyday in our lives as well.




Comment